Received: from relay4.UU.NET (relay4.UU.NET [192.48.96.14]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id QAA12621 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Sun, 31 Dec 1995 16:16:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay4.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQzwns17844; Sun, 31 Dec 1995 16:05:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA21790; Sun, 31 Dec 1995 16:05:20 -0500
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 1995 16:05:20 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <199512312214.OAA04738@you.got.net>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: Ace Miles <ace@got.net>
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: DPaint replacements
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
>I think you'd be amazed at how many people still use it. There was a repeat
>of 'Beyond 2000' on Discovery a couple of days ago where they were profiling
>LucasArts game technology, and there were a number of shots of the familiar
>DAnim screen.
>
>We've tried to change, but when we got a copy of Animator Pro for evaluation,
>nobody liked it. There doesn't really seem to be anything else out there
>for palettized work.
>John.
Actually I believe that the familiar Danim screen you saw was a Lucas Arts
in-house creation. It looks like Dpaint but of course it's cooler cuz they